Asset? No, thank you!
a few weeks, you feel the buzz in the media capital of the idea to cut one third of public debt in many ways pretty justifying, including, as published on the Reform on the generation of babyboomers who had everything and must give something back to future generations. But how do you distinguish a wealth of babyboomers that of another? Another phony argument, is the usual litany of "the rich also cry", but when it comes to tax assets by € 450,000 and up. Who lives in a big city knows that such a heritage is not something so unique: it is sufficient I bought a house a little 'bigger or a house in the suburbs in the 70s or 80s and with backs, building expansion and mythical €, one is left with a legacy to be "rich."
Another case? A modest pair of employees who have saved a lifetime to buy an apartment in town that is now worth between 200 and 300,000 €, some savings, and the two settlements are found with the ghostly figure of 450,000 €! Imagine a family still owns a house with a mortgage to pay, which inherited the apartment of the parents, will easily reach the € 450,000! Besides the damage, the trick! Not only is the mortgage to pay, but also the wealth! In the face of the "sacred" paper costituzionale che parla di tutela del risparmio. Alla fine è sempre il ceto medio-basso a pagare, mentre i ricchi continuano a ridersela.
La tassazione patrimoniale è altamente immorale ed ingiusta, perché si accanisce sulle persone laboriose e parsimoniose che risparmiano ed investono, premiando chi vive alla giornata, va sempre in vacanza, cambia sempre auto e cellulare e sperpera i soldi in mille modi.
Ricordiamoci che il lavoro è tassato già al 50% ed oltre, quindi tassare il patrimonio formatosi dal risparmio su quel restante 50%, che la bontà statale ci lascia, si traduce in una doppia tassazione, anzi tripla, visto che gli immobili e gli investimenti finanziari sono già tassati. Invece di agevolare il risparmio is invited to squander, to live in a rented house and not putting money aside for the future.
How can we hope that Italy will grow, whether as a solution to the political incapacity to solve the problem of debt, we think of a property? Think of an entrepreneur who wants to buy a shed, what do you think that knowing that it will wait for a property? And who of the savings by not will do well to take them abroad? It would be really stupid not to. And you think that Italy can grow? We are more pure madness!
To reduce the public debt, except for a sharp reduction in the state, which probably seems difficult for the current policy, could be implemented depatrimonializzazione a state. Leaving aside Eni, Enel, Finmeccanica, which are useful in the games of Italian foreign policy and do not want to be unrealistic, you may begin to sell the Post Office, as it begins to make profits through the banking, passing to the Railways, the Rai, Fintecna, to continue with the liquidation of banking foundations, thus thinning out the "underbrush" of local authorities, forcing municipalities to privatize the municipal and medium term to end in the sale of so many unused buildings.
someone has the courage to do it?
Another case? A modest pair of employees who have saved a lifetime to buy an apartment in town that is now worth between 200 and 300,000 €, some savings, and the two settlements are found with the ghostly figure of 450,000 €! Imagine a family still owns a house with a mortgage to pay, which inherited the apartment of the parents, will easily reach the € 450,000! Besides the damage, the trick! Not only is the mortgage to pay, but also the wealth! In the face of the "sacred" paper costituzionale che parla di tutela del risparmio. Alla fine è sempre il ceto medio-basso a pagare, mentre i ricchi continuano a ridersela.
La tassazione patrimoniale è altamente immorale ed ingiusta, perché si accanisce sulle persone laboriose e parsimoniose che risparmiano ed investono, premiando chi vive alla giornata, va sempre in vacanza, cambia sempre auto e cellulare e sperpera i soldi in mille modi.
Ricordiamoci che il lavoro è tassato già al 50% ed oltre, quindi tassare il patrimonio formatosi dal risparmio su quel restante 50%, che la bontà statale ci lascia, si traduce in una doppia tassazione, anzi tripla, visto che gli immobili e gli investimenti finanziari sono già tassati. Invece di agevolare il risparmio is invited to squander, to live in a rented house and not putting money aside for the future.
How can we hope that Italy will grow, whether as a solution to the political incapacity to solve the problem of debt, we think of a property? Think of an entrepreneur who wants to buy a shed, what do you think that knowing that it will wait for a property? And who of the savings by not will do well to take them abroad? It would be really stupid not to. And you think that Italy can grow? We are more pure madness!
To reduce the public debt, except for a sharp reduction in the state, which probably seems difficult for the current policy, could be implemented depatrimonializzazione a state. Leaving aside Eni, Enel, Finmeccanica, which are useful in the games of Italian foreign policy and do not want to be unrealistic, you may begin to sell the Post Office, as it begins to make profits through the banking, passing to the Railways, the Rai, Fintecna, to continue with the liquidation of banking foundations, thus thinning out the "underbrush" of local authorities, forcing municipalities to privatize the municipal and medium term to end in the sale of so many unused buildings.
someone has the courage to do it?
Vito Foschi
Tea Party Piedmont
also published on CronacaQui:
